From a concerned friend…
As it turns out, it has been the insulin levels kept high from regularly and frequently eating high-carb foods that is one of the primary causes. Imagine that! You thought that rice was okay eating it at lunch and dinner. It might have been if they were the only high-carb foods. Today, high-carb foods are everywhere and eating for pleasure has become, for many, a necessary social practice. The Government's 3/4 plate carbs recommendations has done nothing to help. What's worst is that if you are prescribed meds to manage your BP, this means your doctor is unaware of the impact of insulin levels himself/herself.
So, what can you do? First, get an independent assessment about the claims about insulin levels and their impact on blood pressure. If convinced, start taking steps to lower your insulin levels back to normal, preferably through food & lifestyle choices. Lastly, wait and watch your BP drop.
Sent from my iPhone
Health & Wealth
Tuesday, 13 May 2025
Monday, 12 May 2025
Complete guide to fasting
It helps but start at your comfort level. If you are already comfortably doing 18:6, try 23:1 next. You will know you are ready when you have little or no hunger pangs at your usual meal times. Do remember to hydrate with salt throughout the fast Black coffee or plain tea is also okay. This is a good resource: https://catalogue.nlb.gov.sg/search/card?recordId=202677222
Monday, 5 May 2025
Fruits and veg not really the best way to fight cancer
FYI. Fruits and veg not really the best way to fight cancer
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/are-fruits-and-vegetables-really-the-best-way-to-fight-cancer-5051759
Sent from my iPhone
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/are-fruits-and-vegetables-really-the-best-way-to-fight-cancer-5051759
Sent from my iPhone
Monday, 28 April 2025
Insulin's role in Cancer* (The same insulin that is raised by high-carb foods)
Sharing ... *Insulin's role in Cancer* (The same insulin that is raised by high-carb foods)
The cancer-provoking potential of insulin was noted as early as 1964. In lab cultures, normal breast cells incubated with insulin proliferated with such enthusiasm that they resembled cancers. Growing breast cancer cells in the laboratory also requires insulin. Lots of insulin. This is an interesting observation because normal breast cells don't really need insulin. Yet breast cancer cells can't live without it. If you remove the insulin from breast cancer cell culture, the cells quickly shrivel up and die. This holds true for other cancers like colorectal, pancreatic, lung, and kidney, too. In mice, injecting insulin induces the growth of breast and colon cancer.
This was a puzzling anomaly. The main tissues normally involved with glucose metabolism, the liver, fat cells, and skeletal muscles, naturally have the highest numbers of insulin receptors. Normal breast tissue? Not so much. So, why does breast cancer thrive on insulin? Breast cancer cells express six times the levels of insulin receptors compared to normal breast cells.
High insulin levels can be measured with a blood test called the C-peptide, which is a protein fragment left over from the body's manufacturing of insulin. High C-peptide levels are associated with an astounding 270 percent to 292 percent increased risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. The women in the Nurses' Health Study with the highest levels of C-peptide had a 76 percent higher risk of colon cancer.
But excess insulin isn't an issue just for those with excess weight. Insulin levels form a spectrum. While those with obesity and diabetes have the highest insulin levels, healthy-weight non-diabetics may also have high insulin levels. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 1999 to 2010 suggest that high insulin levels more than double the risk of cancer regardless of weight status. Non-obese, non-diabetic participants with high insulin levels had a 250 percent increased risk of cancer deaths. *Hyperinsulinemia* in normal weight women (BMI < 25 kg/m2) doubles the risk of breast cancer.
*Injecting* exogenous insulin, a drug more and more commonly prescribed for type 2 diabetes, also increases cancer risk. In the United Kingdom, the number of people with type 2 diabetes who are treated with insulin had grown dramatically from an estimated 37,000 in 1991 to 277,000 in 2010. Weight gain is the major side effect, causing an estimated two kilograms' weight gain for every 1 percent reduction in HgbA1C, a blood test that reflects the average blood glucose over three months. This sounds ominous, as weight gain is a known risk factor for cancer. As researchers dug deeper, the news was not good. In the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database 2000–2010, insulin treatment increased the risk of cancer by 44 percent compared to metformin, a treatment for type 2 diabetes that did not raise insulin levels. Forty-four percent! This was staggering. But this study was not the only one that found insulin treatment to be dangerous.
Data from the province of Saskatchewan, Canada, confirmed that newly diagnosed diabetics starting treatment with insulin had a 90 percent higher risk of cancer compared to those taking the drug metformin. The sulfonylurea drugs, which stimulate insulin secretion, were also linked to a 36 percent increased risk of cancer. More insulin equals more cancer. It's a pretty simple concept. The longer one injects insulin, the higher the risk of cancer.
We know that high insulin levels increase the risk of cancer. But why is insulin so important for cancer progression? Insulin is a hormone best known for its role in glucose metabolism. When we eat, insulin levels rise. When we don't, insulin levels decrease. Insulin is an important nutrient sensor, signaling the presence of food, but what does that have to do with cancer?
In a word: everything. The nutrient sensor insulin is also a highly potent growth factor.
If keen, physical books, ebooks and audio books of The Cancer Code by Dr Jason Fung are available at the NLB
Sent from my iPhone
The cancer-provoking potential of insulin was noted as early as 1964. In lab cultures, normal breast cells incubated with insulin proliferated with such enthusiasm that they resembled cancers. Growing breast cancer cells in the laboratory also requires insulin. Lots of insulin. This is an interesting observation because normal breast cells don't really need insulin. Yet breast cancer cells can't live without it. If you remove the insulin from breast cancer cell culture, the cells quickly shrivel up and die. This holds true for other cancers like colorectal, pancreatic, lung, and kidney, too. In mice, injecting insulin induces the growth of breast and colon cancer.
This was a puzzling anomaly. The main tissues normally involved with glucose metabolism, the liver, fat cells, and skeletal muscles, naturally have the highest numbers of insulin receptors. Normal breast tissue? Not so much. So, why does breast cancer thrive on insulin? Breast cancer cells express six times the levels of insulin receptors compared to normal breast cells.
High insulin levels can be measured with a blood test called the C-peptide, which is a protein fragment left over from the body's manufacturing of insulin. High C-peptide levels are associated with an astounding 270 percent to 292 percent increased risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. The women in the Nurses' Health Study with the highest levels of C-peptide had a 76 percent higher risk of colon cancer.
But excess insulin isn't an issue just for those with excess weight. Insulin levels form a spectrum. While those with obesity and diabetes have the highest insulin levels, healthy-weight non-diabetics may also have high insulin levels. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 1999 to 2010 suggest that high insulin levels more than double the risk of cancer regardless of weight status. Non-obese, non-diabetic participants with high insulin levels had a 250 percent increased risk of cancer deaths. *Hyperinsulinemia* in normal weight women (BMI < 25 kg/m2) doubles the risk of breast cancer.
*Injecting* exogenous insulin, a drug more and more commonly prescribed for type 2 diabetes, also increases cancer risk. In the United Kingdom, the number of people with type 2 diabetes who are treated with insulin had grown dramatically from an estimated 37,000 in 1991 to 277,000 in 2010. Weight gain is the major side effect, causing an estimated two kilograms' weight gain for every 1 percent reduction in HgbA1C, a blood test that reflects the average blood glucose over three months. This sounds ominous, as weight gain is a known risk factor for cancer. As researchers dug deeper, the news was not good. In the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database 2000–2010, insulin treatment increased the risk of cancer by 44 percent compared to metformin, a treatment for type 2 diabetes that did not raise insulin levels. Forty-four percent! This was staggering. But this study was not the only one that found insulin treatment to be dangerous.
Data from the province of Saskatchewan, Canada, confirmed that newly diagnosed diabetics starting treatment with insulin had a 90 percent higher risk of cancer compared to those taking the drug metformin. The sulfonylurea drugs, which stimulate insulin secretion, were also linked to a 36 percent increased risk of cancer. More insulin equals more cancer. It's a pretty simple concept. The longer one injects insulin, the higher the risk of cancer.
We know that high insulin levels increase the risk of cancer. But why is insulin so important for cancer progression? Insulin is a hormone best known for its role in glucose metabolism. When we eat, insulin levels rise. When we don't, insulin levels decrease. Insulin is an important nutrient sensor, signaling the presence of food, but what does that have to do with cancer?
In a word: everything. The nutrient sensor insulin is also a highly potent growth factor.
If keen, physical books, ebooks and audio books of The Cancer Code by Dr Jason Fung are available at the NLB
Sent from my iPhone
Re: The most *impactful* start is by cutting out/down the foods that spike insulin——carbs
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Apr 2025, at 9:53 AM, Chang Cheng Liang <changchengliang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Insulin resistance (attached) ... has identified as the *root* or significant factor in a number of chronic condition. If you are on meds to treat any of these, is your treatment getting to the root cause or are they merely suppressing the symptoms? Resolving insulin resistance is _easy_ if you are consistent and patient. The most *impactful* start is by cutting out/down the foods that spike insulin. _Coincidentally_(😉) carbs are the only macro-nutrient that has the biggest impact (on glucose and consequently) insulin and happens to be the only macro-nutrient that is nutritionally not needed for life. Isn't that interesting?
>
> <PHOTO-2025-04-24-09-50-27.jpg>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Apr 2025, at 9:53 AM, Chang Cheng Liang <changchengliang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Insulin resistance (attached) ... has identified as the *root* or significant factor in a number of chronic condition. If you are on meds to treat any of these, is your treatment getting to the root cause or are they merely suppressing the symptoms? Resolving insulin resistance is _easy_ if you are consistent and patient. The most *impactful* start is by cutting out/down the foods that spike insulin. _Coincidentally_(😉) carbs are the only macro-nutrient that has the biggest impact (on glucose and consequently) insulin and happens to be the only macro-nutrient that is nutritionally not needed for life. Isn't that interesting?
>
> <PHOTO-2025-04-24-09-50-27.jpg>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Re: The most *impactful* start is by cutting out/down the foods that spike insulin——carbs
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Apr 2025, at 9:53 AM, Chang Cheng Liang <changchengliang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Insulin resistance (attached) ... has identified as the *root* or significant factor in a number of chronic condition. If you are on meds to treat any of these, is your treatment getting to the root cause or are they merely suppressing the symptoms? Resolving insulin resistance is _easy_ if you are consistent and patient. The most *impactful* start is by cutting out/down the foods that spike insulin. _Coincidentally_(😉) carbs are the only macro-nutrient that has the biggest impact (on glucose and consequently) insulin and happens to be the only macro-nutrient that is nutritionally not needed for life. Isn't that interesting?
>
> <PHOTO-2025-04-24-09-50-27.jpg>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Apr 2025, at 9:53 AM, Chang Cheng Liang <changchengliang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Insulin resistance (attached) ... has identified as the *root* or significant factor in a number of chronic condition. If you are on meds to treat any of these, is your treatment getting to the root cause or are they merely suppressing the symptoms? Resolving insulin resistance is _easy_ if you are consistent and patient. The most *impactful* start is by cutting out/down the foods that spike insulin. _Coincidentally_(😉) carbs are the only macro-nutrient that has the biggest impact (on glucose and consequently) insulin and happens to be the only macro-nutrient that is nutritionally not needed for life. Isn't that interesting?
>
> <PHOTO-2025-04-24-09-50-27.jpg>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
insulin levels kept high from regularly and frequently eating high-carb foods that is one of the primary causes
From a concerned friend… As it turns out, it has been the insulin levels kept high from regularly and frequently eating high-carb foods t...
-
Good advice from a friend: You can't go wrong with eating natural whole foods (chicken instead of nuggets, potatoes instead of chips, ...
-
A spike in blood glucose has no outward sign although many are familiar with how hyperactive children are after a sugary meal. What is also...
-
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a systematic review ...